CASE DIGEST (Transportation Law): C.B. Williams vs. Yangco

C. B. WILLIAMS vs. TEODORO R. YANGCO
G.R. No. L-8325. March 10, 1914

FACTS:
The steamer Subic, owned by the defendant, collided with the lunch Euclid owned by the plaintiff, in the Bay of Manila at an early hour on the morning of January 9, 1911, and the Euclid sank five minutes thereafter. This action was brought to recover the value of the Euclid.

The court below held from the evidence submitted that the Euclid was worth at a fair valuation P10,000; that both vessels were responsible for the collision; and that the loss should be divided equally between the respective owners, P5,000 to be paid the plaintiff by the defendant, and P5,000 to be borne by the plaintiff himself. From this judgment both defendant and plaintiff appealed.

ISSUE:
Whether or not plaintiff should not be held liable on account of doctrine of last clear chance—the defendant having the last opportunity to avoid the collision.

HELD:
No.
In cases of a disaster arising from the mutual negligence of two parties, the party who has a last clear opportunity of avoiding the accident, notwithstanding the negligence of his opponent, is considered wholly responsible for it under the common-law rule of liability as applied in the courts of common law of the United States. But this rule (which is not recognized in the courts of admiralty in the United States, wherein the loss is divided in cases of mutual and concurring negligence, as also where the error of one vessel has exposed her to danger of collision which was consummated by he further rule, that where the previous application by the further rule, that where the previous act of negligence of one vessel has created a position of danger, the other vessel is not necessarily liable for the mere failure to recognize the perilous situation; and it is only when in fact it does discover it in time to avoid the casualty by the use of ordinary care, that it becomes liable for the failure to make use of this last clear opportunity to avoid the accident. (See cases cited in Notes, 7 Cyc., pp. 311, 312, 313.) So, under the English rule which conforms very nearly to the common-law rule as applied in the American courts, it has been held that the fault of the first vessel in failing to exhibit proper lights or to take the proper side of the channel will relieve from liability one who negligently runs into such vessels before he sees it; although it will not be a defense to one who, having timely warning of the danger of collision, fails to use proper care to avoid it. (Pollock on Torts, 374.). In the case at bar, the most that can be said in support of plaintiff's contention is that there was negligence on the part of the officers on defendant's vessel in failing to recognize the perilous situation created by the negligence of those in charge of plaintiff's launch, and that had they recognized it in time, they might have avoided the accident. But since it does not appear from the evidence that they did, in fact, discover the perilous situation of the launch in time to avoid the accident by the exercise of ordinary care, it is very clear that under the above set out limitation to the rule, the plaintiff cannot escape the legal consequences of the contributory negligence of his launch, even were we to hold that the doctrine is applicable in the jurisdiction, upon which point we expressly reserve our decision at this time.

CASE DIGEST (Transportation Law): Monarch Insurance Co., Inc. vs. CA

MONARCH INSURANCE CO., INC vs. COURT OF APPEALS and ABOITIZ SHIPPING CORPORATION
G.R. No. 92735. June 8, 2000

FACTS:
Monarch and Tabacalera are insurance carriers of lost cargoes. They indemnified the shippers and were consequently subrogated to their rights, interests and actions against Aboitiz, the cargo carrier. Because Aboitiz refused to compensate Monarch, it filed two complaints against Aboitiz which were consolidated and jointly tried.

Aboitiz rejected responsibility for the claims on the ground that the sinking of its cargo vessel was due to force majeure or an act of God. Aboitiz was subsequently declared as in default and allowed Monarch and Tabacalera to present evidence ex-parte.

ISSUE:
Whether or not the doctrine of limited liability applies in the instant case.

HELD:
Yes.
The failure of Aboitiz to present sufficient evidence to exculpate itself from fault and/or negligence in the sinking of its vessel in the face of the foregoing expert testimony constrains us to hold that Aboitiz was concurrently at fault and/or negligent with the ship captain and crew of the M/V P. Aboitiz. [This is in accordance with the rule that in cases involving the limited liability of shipowners, the initial burden of proof of negligence or unseaworthiness rests on the claimants. However, once the vessel owner or any party asserts the right to limit its liability, the burden of proof as to lack of privity or knowledge on its part with respect to the matter of negligence or unseaworthiness is shifted to it. This burden, Aboitiz had unfortunately failed to discharge.] That Aboitiz failed to discharge the burden of proving that the unseaworthiness of its vessel was not due to its fault and/or negligence should not however mean that the limited liability rule will not be applied to the present cases. The peculiar circumstances here demand that there should be no strict adherence to procedural rules on evidence lest the just claims of shippers/insurers be frustrated. The rule on limited liability should be applied in accordance with the latest ruling in Aboitiz Shipping Corporation v. General Accident Fire and Life Assurance Corporation, Ltd.,] promulgated on January 21, 1993, that claimants be treated as "creditors in an insolvent corporation whose assets are not enough to satisfy the totality of claims against it."

CASE DIGEST (Transportation Law): Aboitiz Shipping Corp. vs. New India Assurance Co., Ltd

ABOITIZ SHIPPING CORPORATION vs. NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY, LTD G..R. No. 156978 May 2, 2006

FACTS:
Societe Francaise Des Colloides loaded a cargo of textiles and auxiliary chemicals from France on board a vessel owned by Franco-Belgian Services, Inc. The cargo was consigned to General Textile, Inc., in Manila and insured by respondent New India Assurance Company, Ltd. While in Hong Kong, the cargo was transferred to M/V P. Aboitiz for transshipment to Manila.

Before departing, the vessel was advised by the Japanese Meteorological Center that it was safe to travel to its destination. But while at sea, the vessel received a report of a typhoon moving within its general path. To avoid the typhoon, the vessel changed its course. However, it was still at the fringe of the typhoon when its hull leaked. On October 31, 1980, the vessel sank, but the captain and his crew were saved.

Both the trial and the appellate courts found that the sinking was not due to the typhoon but to its unseaworthiness.

ISSUE:
Whether the limited liability doctrine, which limits respondent’s award of damages to its pro-rata share in the insurance proceeds, applies in this case.

HELD:
No. x x x An exception to the limited liability doctrine is when the damage is due to the fault of the shipowner or to the concurrent negligence of the shipowner and the captain. In which case, the shipowner shall be liable to the full-extent of the damage.

x x x

In the present case, petitioner has the burden of showing that it exercised extraordinary diligence in the transport of the goods it had on board in order to invoke the limited liability doctrine. Differently put, to limit its liability to the amount of the insurance proceeds, petitioner has the burden of proving that the unseaworthiness of its vessel was not due to its fault or negligence. Considering the evidence presented and the circumstances obtaining in this case, we find that
petitioner failed to discharge this burden. It initially attributed the sinking to the typhoon and relied on the BMI findings that it was not at fault. However, both the trial and the appellate courts, in this case, found that the sinking was not due to the typhoon but to its unseaworthiness. Evidence on record showed that the weather was moderate when the vessel sank. These factual findings of the Court of Appeals, affirming those of the trial court are not to be disturbed on appeal, but must be accorded great weight. These findings are conclusive not only on the parties but on this Court as well.

Case Digest in Evidence (Remedial Law): Silot vs. De la Rosa

GREGORIO SILOT, JR. vs. ESTRELLA DE LA ROSA

[G.R. No. 159240. February 4, 2008]

FACTS:
Petitioner Silot and respondent de la Rosa entered into a contract for the construction of a dormitory-apartment building. They expressly agreed that Silot shall supply the labor and de la Rosa shall pay 33% of the total value of the materials purchased for the project. Upon turnover of the completed structure, the total cost of materials actually purchased was P2,504,469.65, 33% of which is P826,474.98. Silot required de la Rosa to pay a total of P1,018,000.00, or P191,525.02 more than the amount due. Through her son-in-law, de la Rosa confronted Silot about the overpayment but the latter refused to return the overpayment. After her repeated demands fell on deaf ears, de la Rosa filed a suit against Silot. Silot, in retaliation, sued de la Rosa for insufficient payment, claiming that he was supposed to receive P1,281,872.404 but was only paid P1,008,000.00, thus still leaving a balance of P273,872.40.

During trial, however, Atty. San Jose, counsel for Silot, dispensed with the testimony of Ariel Goingo, a witness for de la Rosa. Atty. San Jose admitted Goingo's proposed testimony to the effect that in consideration of the 33% as mentioned in the contract, all the material supplies during the making of the additional works mentioned were already accounted for; that Silot was paid for all works that were performed as well as all materials supplied; that the total sum was P2,504,469.65, so that 33% of which is only P826,474.98; that de la Rosa paid the amount of P1,018,000.00; hence, there was an excess payment of P191,525.02; and that de la Rosa never received any demand from nor was she confronted by Silot regarding an alleged balance.

Consequently, after trial, the RTC ruled in favor of de la Rosa and ordered Silot to return the overpaid amount. On appeal, the Court of Appeals affirmed the decision of the lower court.

ISSUE:
Whether the admission by Atty. San Jose, counsel of petitioner Silot, constituted judicial admission of respondent's evidence.

HELD:
Yes.
Moreover, well-entrenched is the rule that the client is bound by the mistakes arising from negligence of his own counsel. The only exception to this rule is, as the Court of Appeals itself cited in its decision, when the negligence is so gross that the client is deprived of his day in court.

In our considered view, however, that exception does not find any application in this case. As the records would plainly show, Silot was not deprived of his day in court. Also, as the appellate court observed, he could have introduced evidence, testimonial or otherwise, in order to controvert or correct the admission made by his counsel. Said the appellate court:

…As gleaned from the records, defendant-appellant Silot was not deprived of his day in court. He was given every opportunity to be heard through his pleadings and manifestations. He was also presented in open court to testify. As quoted earlier, Atty. Terbio, counsel for plaintiff-appellee de la Rosa, even repeatedly asked Atty. San Jose, defendant-appellant Silot's counsel, if he would admit the purpose for which the witness Ariel Goingo will testify to dispense with his testimony, and Atty. San Jose repeatedly answered that "We will admit that." And when asked by the judge if he will admit it, he answered that they will admit P2,504,000.00.

More importantly, Silot's counsel clearly made admissions of the content of the testimony of witness Goingo, whose presentation was dispensed with. In People v. Hernandez, we held that admissions made for the purpose of dispensing with proof of some facts are in the nature of judicial admissions, to wit:

A stipulation of facts entered into by the prosecution and defense counsel during trial in open court is automatically reduced into writing and contained in the official transcript of the proceedings had in court. The conformity of the accused in the form of his signature affixed thereto is unnecessary in view of the fact that: "[…] an attorney who is employed to manage a party's conduct of a lawsuit […] has prima facie authority to make relevant admissions by pleadings, by oral or written stipulation, […] which unless allowed to be withdrawn are conclusive." (Italics supplied.) In fact, "judicial admissions are frequently those of counsel or of the attorney of record, who is, for the purpose of the trial, the agent of his client. When such admissions are made […] for the purpose of dispensing with proof of some fact, […] they bind the client, whether made during, or even after, the trial.

Worth stressing, in this connection, judicial admissions do not require proof and may not be contradicted in the absence of a prior showing that the admissions had been made through palpable mistake.

Furthermore, in the case of Toh v. Court of Appeals, this Court emphasized the consequence of admitting and dispensing with the testimony of the proposed witness, thus:


The Court sees no cogent reason why the said witness should be examined any further since his testimony as summarized in the offer made by counsel was expressly admitted by opposing counsel. With the said admission, the testimony of said witness is uncontroverted and even admitted as fact by opposing counsel.…

Case Digest in Evidence (Remedial Law): Cuenco vs. Talisay Tourist Sports Complex, Inc.

JESUS CUENCO vs. TALISAY TOURIST SPORTS COMPLEX, INC. and MATIAS B. AZNAR III

[G.R. No. 174154, October 17, 2008]

FACTS:
Petitioner leased from respondent a property to be operated as a cockpit. Upon expiration of the contract, respondent company conducted a public bidding for the lease of the property. Petitioner participated in the bidding. The lease was eventually awarded to another bidder. Thereafter, petitioner formally demanded, through several demand letters, for the return of his deposit in the sum of P500, 000.00. It, however, all remained unheeded.

Thus, petitioner filed a Complaint for sum of money maintaining that respondents acted in bad faith in withholding the amount of the deposit without any justifiable reason. In their Answer, respondents countered that petitioner caused physical damage to the leased premises and the cost of repair and replacement of materials amounted to more than P500,000.00.

The RTC issued a Pre-trial Order in which respondent admitted that there is no inventory of damages. The respondents later offered an inventory which was admitted by the said trial court. The RTC ruled favorably for the petitioner. The CA reversed said decision.

ISSUES:
Whether a judicial admission is conclusive and binding upon a party making the admission.

HELD:
Yes.
Obviously, it was on Coronado's testimony, as well as on the documentary evidence of an alleged property inventory conducted on June 4, 1998, that the CA based its conclusion that the amount of damage sustained by the leased premises while in the possession of petitioner exceeded the amount of petitioner's deposit. This contradicts the judicial admission made by respondents' counsel which should have been binding on the respondents.

Section 4, Rule 129 of the Rules of Court provides:
SEC. 4. Judicial admissions. - An admission, verbal or written, made by a party in the course of the proceedings in the same case, does not require proof. The admission may be contradicted only by a showing that it was made through palpable mistake or that no such admission was made.

A party may make judicial admissions in (1) the pleadings, (2) during the trial, by verbal or written manifestations or stipulations, or (3) in other stages of the judicial proceeding. The stipulation of facts at the pre-trial of a case constitutes judicial admissions. The veracity of judicial admissions require no further proof and may be controverted only upon a clear showing that the admissions were made through palpable mistake or that no admissions were made. Thus, the admissions of parties during the pre-trial, as embodied in the pre-trial order, are binding and conclusive upon them.

Respondents did not deny the admission made by their counsel, neither did they claim that the same was made through palpable mistake. As such, the stipulation of facts is incontrovertible and may be relied upon by the courts. The pre-trial forms part of the proceedings and matters dealt therein may not be brushed aside in the process of decision-making. Otherwise, the real essence of compulsory pre-trial would be rendered inconsequential and worthless. Furthermore, an act performed by counsel within the scope of a "general or implied authority" is
regarded as an act of the client which renders respondents in estoppel. By estoppel is meant that an admission or representation is conclusive upon the person making it and cannot be denied or disproved as against the person relying thereon.

Thus, respondents are bound by the admissions made by their counsel at the pre-trial. Accordingly, the CA committed an error when it gave ample evidentiary weight to respondents' evidence contradictory to the judicial admission.

SC flip-flops again, rules laws creating 16 cities constitutional

By Tetch Torres INQUIRER.net
First Posted 17:23:00 02/16/2011

MANILA, Philippines— For the third time, the Supreme Court on Wednesday flip-flopped on its decision as it again reversed its August 2010 ruling that declared as unconstitutional the cityhood laws or Republic Acts converting 16 municipalities into cities.

In the ruling penned by Associate Justice Lucas Bersamin, the high court reverted to its December 2009 decision declaring as constitutional the cityhood laws that converted the 16 cities into municipalities.

“This is a very unusual case considering that the court issued four decisions on this,” high court spokesman Jose Midas Marquez said referring to the November 2008, December 2009, August 2010 and Wednesday’s ruling.

Marquez attributed the changes in the decision to the composition of the Supreme Court noting that some justices who were part of the November 2008 deliberation have already retired.

“A change in the composition (of the high court) can influence the outcome of the case,” Marquez said.

Declared as constitutional were RA Nos. 9389 (creating Baybay City in Leyte), 9390 (Bogo City in Cebu), 9391 (Catbalogan City in Samar), 9392 (Tandag City in Surigao del Sur), 9393 (Lamitan City in Basilan), 9394 (Borongan City in Samar), 9398 (Tayabas City in Quezon), 9404 (Tabuk City in Kalinga), 9405 (Bayugan City in Agusan del Sur), 9407 (Batac City in Ilocos Norte), 9408 (Mati City in Davao Oriental), 9409 (Guihulngan City in Negros Oriental), 9434 (Cabadbaran City in Agusan del Norte), 9435 (El Salvador City in Misamis Oriental), 9436 (Carcar City in Cebu), and 9491 (Naga City in Cebu).

On Nov. 18, 2008, the high court nullified the 16 cityhood laws for violating the Constitution. The decision became final after the high court denied its first motion for reconsideration while a divided high court with a vote of 6-6 denied the second appeal. Then, on May 21, 2009, the high court said it would no longer allow any pleadings related to the case.

However, the town mayors urged the high court to resolve the second motion for reconsideration that led to a reversal of its November 2008 decision and declared the 16 laws constitutional in its December 2009 decision.

The League of Cities of the Philippines (LCP) filed a motion for reconsideration asking the high court to reinstate its November 2008 decision, which it granted in a resolution issued August 2010.

Then, the town mayors appealed the August 2010 ruling which was reversed on Wednesday by the high court.


Marquez said this case was “very unusual” and that this could not be cited by other parties with pending cases with the high court because its decision is pro hac vice (for this particular occasion).

SC admonishes UP law dean, professors on plagiarism case

By Tetch Torres INQUIRER.net
First Posted 17:48:00 03/08/2011
Filed Under: Legal issues, Judiciary (system of justice)

MANILA, Philippines—The Supreme Court on Tuesday admonished University of the Philippines (UP) College of Law Dean Marvic Leonen for leading its faculty to join the call for Supreme Court Associate Justice Mariano Del Castillo to resign over the issue of plagiarism.

“UP Law Dean Marvic Leonen is admonished for setting a bad example to our law students,” high court Spokesman Jose Midas Marquez said at a press conference Tuesday at the Supreme Court’s en banc session hall.

Voting 9-5, Marquez said the high court exonerated UP law professor Raul Vasquez after he apologized before the court.

Thirty-five other professors were reminded of their duty as officers of the court. They are Froilan Bacungan, Pacifico Agabin, Merlin Magallona, Salvador Carlota, Carmelo Sison, Patricia Salvador Daway, Dante Gatmaytan, Theodore Te, Florin Hilbay, Jay Batongbacal, Evelyn (Leo) Battad, Gwen de Vera, Solomon Lumba, Rommel Casis, Jose Gerardo Alampay, Miguel Armovit, Arthur Autea, Rosa Maria Bautista;

Mark Bocobo, Dan Calica, Tristan Catindig, Sandra Marie Coronel, Rosario Gallo, Concepcion Jardeleza, Antonio La Viña, Carina Laforteza, Jose Laureta, Owen Lynch, Rodolfo Noel Quimbo, Antonio Santos, Gmeleen Faye Tomboc, Nicholas Felix Ty, Evalyn Ursua, Susan Villanueva and Dina Lucenario.

“The Justices found the compliance of the UP faculty unsatisfactory,” Marquez said.

The UP faculty issued a statement on Aug. 6, 2010, accusing Associate Justice Mariano del Castillo of plagiarism in a decision he wrote on a case filed by so-called comfort women.

The statement said that “the plagiarism committed in the case of Vinuya v Executive Secretary is unacceptable, unethical and in breach of the high standards of moral conduct and judicial and professional competence expected of the Supreme Court.”

The high court, however, cleared Del Castillo of plagiarism. In October last year, it ordered the UP signatories to explain why administrative sanctions should not be imposed on them.

Marquez said the Supreme Court “found the compliance of the UP Faculty unsatisfactory.”

The Justices who dissented from the majority decision were Senior Associate Justice Antonio Carpio, Associate Justices Conchita Carpio-Morales, Antonio Eduardo Nachura, Martin Villarama and Maria Lourdes Sereno.

Source Inquirer.net

2010 Bar Exam Results (released in 2011)

2010 Bar Examination Passers (982 out of 4,847 or 20.26 %)

The top 10 bar examinees (Topnotchers)

1. Caesario Antonio S. Singzon, Ateneo de Manila University (ADMU), 89.000
2. Filemon Ray L. Javier, ADMU, 86.850
3. Paolo Carlo C. Tolentino, Arellano University, 86.800
4. Janette R. Ancog, Ateneo de Davao University, 85.900
5. Johanna Sunga, ADMU, 85.850
6. Krizelle Marie F. Poblacion, University of the Philippines, 85.650
7. Maria Christina C. Ortua, UP, 85.50
Krystal Lyn T. Uy, UP, 85.50
8. Johanna Eileen M. Capones, UP, 84.800
9. Wiliam Benson S. Gan, ADMU, 84.750
10. Glenn C. Carampatana, University of San carlos, 84.550
Darren L. Salipsip, Arellano University, 84.550

Complete List

1. ABAD, Charmee R .

2. ABADA, Merlin I .

3. ABARIENTOS, Ma. Theresa M .

4. ABBAS, JR., Yusoph M .

5. ABELLA, Charmian Maria F .

6. ABELLA, Sheena Marie R .

7. ABIERA-MONTESA, Rosalyn B .

8. ABING, Ramil P .

9. ABONG, Mark Julio U .

10. ABRAGAN, Martin Luke G .

11. ABRAHAM, Sarah Joan M .

12. ABUBACAR, Rayhanah M .

13. ABUGAN, Herbert Calvin P .

14. ABUNDO, Judith Rowena D .

15. ABUZO, Djerovin T .

16. ABUZO, James M .

17. ACACIO, Rea Andria L .

18. ACAYAN, Moises Y .

19. ACEJO, Michael A .

20. ACUÑA, Emmanuel L .

21. ADAOAG, Maria Efelin C .

22. ADRIANO, Jasmine M .

23. ADRIATICO, Maria Clarissa N .

24. ADVINCULA, Margaux A .

25. AFIADO, Manuel Emilio B .

26. AFRICA, Marie Denise G .

27. AGA, Dennis M .

28. AGLIBOT, Ma. Katrina J .

29. AGNO, Regina Domini L .

30. AGUILA, Mary Jasmin P .

31. AGUILERA, Raymond G .

32. AGUINALDO, Ma. Angela Leonor C .

33. AGUSTIN, Paulo Francisco A .

34. AJERO, Chris A .

35. AKUT, Charissa Joy C .

36. ALADO, Patrick Vincent A .

37. ALAMIN, Lorajean A .

38. ALBARICO, Allesandra Fay V .

39. ALBERTO-ESTRELLA, Grace Irish C .

40. ALBURO, Alvin L .

41. ALCALA, Carla Diana P .

42. ALCANTARA, Rina C .

43. ALCOMENDRAS, Andrey A .

44. ALEGRADO, Julius P .

45. ALFARO, Plebiscito T .

46. ALIAS, Margarita R .

47. ALICAYA, Giancarlo T .

48. ALICO, Wendy Josephine L .

49. ALMAZAN, Gladys Joy B .

50. ALMIRANTE, JR., Eduardo Q .

51. ALONZO, Ronalin B .

52. ALVAREZ, Tyrone O .

53. ALVIOR, Marianne Carmel D .

54. ALZONA, Ivin Ronald DM.

55. AMOROSO, Dranyl Jared P .

56. AMURAO, Mark Anthony T .

57. ANCHETA, Glenn Thyron S .

58. ANCOG, Janette R .

59. ANDOY-GAWIDEN, Sol Marie P .

60. ANDRES, Ryan D .

61. ANDRES, JR., Antonio D .

62. ANG, Noel C .

63. ANGGOT, Anabelle A .

64. ANIAG, Bernard Benjamin T .

65. ANTONIO, Chantal Charisse Q .

66. APOLINAR, Jannierose O .

67. APOLINAR, Leanne Maureen S .

68. APOLINARIO, Reiner P .

69. AQUINO, Mark Christian M .

70. AQUINO, Philipe T .

71. ARANAS, Lucky Angelo T .

72. ARANDELA, Melrose R .

73. ARAO, Amador Iñigo L .

74. ARCENO, Arnold P .

75. ARCEÑO, Dee A .

76. ARDET, Arnie T .

77. ARENAS, Mark Ranier C .

78. ARNOCO, Marvey J .

79. ARQUILLO, Ma. Golda G .

80. ASDILLO, Angeline T .

81. ASENIERO, Antonio C .

82. ASILO, Kathrine Ann D .

83. ASIS, Enrico D .

84. ASIS, John Michael V .

85. ASUNCION, Amiel Victor A .

86. AUSTRIA, Katherine M .

87. AUSTRIA, Laurice Marie Angela T .

88. AVENIDO, Gian Marco F .

89. AVILA, Analyn G .

90. AZNAR, Katrina Monserrat F .

91. AZURA, Jules Emmanuel N .

92. AÑONUEVO, Leo Angelo Miguel R .

93. BABATUAN, Lei Maurae E .

94. BABON, Joanne B .

95. BABOR, Sarah Faye Q .

96. BACABAC, Candice V .

97. BACANI, Ramon Miguel E .

98. BACLAYEN, Pilipinas D .

99. BACSAL, Eric Allan E .

100. BADANDO, Artemis Q .

101. BAGAFORO, II-ARELLANO, Agnes Farida S .

102. BAGAMASPAD, Cris Lawrence A .

103. BAGO, Jayfrancis D .

104. BALAG-EY, Paul M .

105. BALAJADIA, Christine B .

106. BALALENG, Emil Rey I .

107. BALANA, Carmie A .

108. BALANAG, Kristine Gay B .

109. BALANSAY, Lorelei S .

110. BALAO, Edward Vincent P .

111. BALBASTRE, Billie Joy A .

112. BALDOZA, Limuel V .

113. BALGUA, JR., Mariano V .

114. BALISI, Reody Anthony M .

115. BALISONG, Analene V .

116. BALITA, Vanessa Juvy O .

117. BALMORES, John Paul M .

118. BALUCANAG, Suzette B .

119. BALUYUT, Cesar M .

120. BANDAL, Jason M .

121. BANDONG, Jayvee Laurence B .

122. BANGAYAN, Carrie Mae C .

123. BANTILAN, Bryan G .

124. BAQUIRAN, Joseph Lemuel B .

125. BARCENA, Johann Carlos S .

126. BARGAMENTO, Hazan F .

127. BARRAMEDA, Paul Isaac A .

128. BARRIENTOS, Marie Aileen L .

129. BATAAN, Aleah Rafel G .

130. BATALLER, Diana Elaine B .

131. BATALLONES, Gino Angelo P .

132. BATAY-AN, Rex D .

133. BAUTISTA, Carlo Antonio A .

134. BAUTISTA, Claribelle S .

135. BAUTISTA, Gilbert B .

136. BAUTISTA, Jose Javier P .

137. BAUTISTA, Melissa Ann M .

138. BAUTISTA, JR., Raymundo B .

139. BAUZA, Brian Ashley M .

140. BAYBAY, Ray-an Francis V .

141. BAÑEZ, Roselyn G .

142. BECEIRA, Rona M .

143. BEDING, Ronald Y .

144. BEJOSA, Theeza Danielle P .

145. BELCIÑA, Celeste B .

146. BELDEROL, Mary Joy P .

147. BELGICA, Marietta M .

148. BENITEZ, Lovelle B .

149. BENTULAN, Mae L .

150. BERAMO, Maria Daniaflor F .

151. BERNABE, Ericia P .

152. BERNARDO, Romina R .

153. BERNARTE, Kristine M .

154. BESOÑA, Rholie C .

155. BEÑAS, Kristine Paul B .

156. BIBANGCO, Jorlett L .

157. BISA, Myzel B .

158. BISNAR, Gerardo Alfredo M .

159. BLAS, Herbert J .

160. BONGCAWIL, Cherrie Mae J .

161. BORAIS, Charlyn D .

162. BORROMEO, Renato P .

163. BOSANTOG, Marlon P .

164. BROFAR, Reinier John G .

165. BUCIO, Erwin B .

166. BUDUHAN, Diana Grace D .

167. BUEN-MERENCILLA, Paula Michelle O .

168. BUENAVENTURA, Kathy C .

169. BUENAVENTURA, Kristoffer N .

170. BUENO, Gemicks Ace T .

171. BUENSUCESO, Sean M .

172. BUETA, Gregorio Rafael P .

173. BULAC, Michelle Mae C .

174. BULANG, Oliver C .

175. BULIYAT, Marie Mae D .

176. BUMATAY-GEMARINO, Sharon N .

177. BURKLEY, Florence Diana V .

178. BUROG, Marie Irahlyn C .

179. BUSQUE, Janice H .

180. BUSTONERA, Chito Noel D .

181. CABATINGAN, Marisar Ivy C .

182. CABE, Rodalice P .

183. CABRADILLA, Fritz M .

184. CABRERA, Stanley Kristoffer V .

185. CABUDOC, Edsel R .

186. CABUGAO, John Philip O .

187. CADAYDAY, JR., Clayton C .

188. CADLUM-BOCO, Eusebia A .

189. CAGUETE, Joan Kathlyn C .

190. CAGUIAT, Johnny DC.

191. CAGUIOA, Francis Carlos C .

192. CAHIG, Carmela Rosario C .

193. CALANGI, Amelia A .

194. CALI, Nesrin B .

195. CALIBUYOT, Gwin V .

196. CALIMAG, Maria Rizza M .

197. CALINGASAN, Christian C .

198. CALIP, Norren Joy B .

199. CALIPAYAN, Jamaal James R .

200. CALO, Ludmilia L .

201. CALSADO, Anna Carmi R .

202. CAMPOS, Rosalinda G .

203. CANCINO, Christopher M .

204. CANDA-MELODIAS, Cherry P .

205. CANO, Darwin F .

206. CANTRE, JR., Recolito Ferdinand N .

207. CAPONES, Joanna Eileen M .

208. CAPUL, Christopher P .

209. CARAMPATANA, Glenn C .

210. CARANDANG, Carlo Brian S .

211. CARLOS, Kristine Joy G .

212. CARREON, Divina N .

213. CARREON, Jerilee R .

214. CASIS, Rainier J .

215. CASIÑO, Rhett S .

216. CASPE, Ma. Jesusa D .

217. CASTILLO, Lysander N .

218. CASTILLO, Margaret V .

219. CASTRO, Premier Dee Ewigkeit C .

220. CATABAY, Criselda J .

221. CATEDRAL, Ralph Vincent G .

222. CAYMO, II, Apolinario L .

223. CELIS, Ana Katrina C .

224. CENIZA, Brian P .

225. CERCADO, Crispin Simoun P .

226. CERO, De Mille V .

227. CHAGUILE, Adryan B .

228. CHERREGUINE, Clarence G .

229. CHING, Margaret R .

230. CHING, Princess Bambi B .

231. CHOTRANI, Dolly J .

232. CHUA, Germaine L .

233. CHUA, Katrina Pearl C .

234. CHUA-ASIS, Maria Aileen R .

235. CHUA-CHAM, Rosita

236. CHUNG, Jae Woo

237. CIUDADANO, Gil Norman D .

238. CLARAVALL, Benedicto Bienvenido C .

239. CO, Joan Kristel C .

240. CO, Zsa Zsa Lae K .

241. CODERA, Jandy P .

242. COLOMA, Janice G .

243. COLONIA, Chito John J .

244. COLOYAN, Sigrid Smile P .

245. COMIA, Frankie E .

246. CONCEPCION, Aleli U .

247. CONCEPCION, Anthony Chadd R .

248. CONDE, Bethany V .

249. CONOS, JR., Servillano A .

250. CONSTANTINO, Jeffrey B .

251. CORPUS, Ponciano Dexter Hector S .

252. CORTEZ, Deneesse Lou T .

253. CORTEZ, II, Jose Charito I .

254. COSALAN, Katarina Gabrielle V .

255. CRUZ, Eric C .

256. CRUZ, Jonas C .

257. CRUZ, Nicolette Ann P .

258. CRUZ, Ria Carmela R .

259. CRUZ, Trisha Andrea G .

260. CRUZ, Vincent Patrick R .

261. CUADRA-ROBINTA, Madyll S .

262. CUANAN, JR., Edgard B .

263. CUARTERO, Mary Anne C .

264. CUERPO, Von Bryan C .

265. CUIZON, Jasmine L .

266. CURADA, Alvin B .

267. CUTARAN-CONTACTO, Yvette F .

268. DADULA, Joel B .

269. DALAGAN, Maria Romina M .

270. DALAUIDAO, Jan Michael U .

271. DALIVA, JR., Anacleto I .

272. DARVIN, Daniel Nicholas C .

273. DATO-ABUEL, Juanita Lilet A .

274. DAVID, Melba A .

275. DAVIS, Herbert C .

276. DE ALBAN, Ma. Caren Gail M .

277. DE CASTRO-BAQUIRAN, Cristine A .

278. DE CHAVEZ, Maricel L .

279. DE GUZMAN, Adrian T .

280. DE GUZMAN, Angela T .

281. DE GUZMAN, Ria Flor C .

282. DE LA CRUZ, Paul Vincent G .

283. DE LA CRUZ-JAVIER, Sheba V .

284. DE LEON, Carlos Rafael G .

285. DE LEON, Ian Jerny E .

286. DE VERA, Reagan S .

287. DEAÑO, Carmelita D .

288. DEIPARINE, Sydrick Jose Andrei G .

289. DEL BARRIO-ALCANSE, Franchesca L .

290. DEL CAMPO, Charisse Kay J .

291. DEL ROSARIO, Jerome F .

292. DEL ROSARIO, Powell A .

293. DEL ROSARIO, Richard M .

294. DEL VALLE, Irish Kay J .

295. DELA CRUZ, Ramon Alfredo E .

296. DELA CRUZ, JR., Cresencio D .

297. DELA PEÑA, Plen John Mark M .

298. DELOSO, Izelle Iamly P .

299. DENSING, Teresita A .

300. DIAZ, Robelita B .

301. DIGAUM, Ma. Zusabel R .

302. DIMAANO, Mae Belle D .

303. DIMAANO, Manuel M .

304. DIMARUCUT, Bernadette C .

305. DIONISIO, Emmylou M .

306. DIONISIO, Lorenze Angelo G .

307. DIZON-VICTORIO, Cristy B .

308. DOCENA, Melinda L .

309. DOCTOR, Brenn A .

310. DOLENDO, Arvin C .

311. DOLON, Nadine B .

312. DOMASIAN, Evan E .

313. DOMINGO, Jennifer V .

314. DONALVO, Percy Valsan Jun P .

315. DONATO, James Daniel S .

316. DUGASAN, Ann Kilsa M .

317. DULHAO, Mary Joan M .

318. DULLA, Maria Estrella G .

319. DULLANO, Phoebe Lou B .

320. DUMALE, Eraño A .

321. DUMDUM, Genevieve T .

322. DUMLAO, Nadine U .

323. DUÑGO, Carl Derick C .

324. DUÑOS, Lory Jean G .

325. EDQUILAG, Michael R .

326. EGAY, Aimee Faith L .

327. ELEAZAR, Norguel Yazer M .

328. ELMACO, Lloyd Jeson L .

329. EMATA, Sheila Marie P .

330. EMRALINO, Maria Virginia P .

331. ENCONADO, Aman Y .

332. ENDICO, Marricar C .

333. ENDRENAL, Anthony L .

334. ENDRINO-FRANCISCO, Florida L .

335. ENRIQUEZ, Kristie Auriel T .

336. EPONDULAN, Yvonne A .

337. ESCALANTE, Daisy L .

338. ESMAN, Persel G .

339. ESPEDIDO, Spence V .

340. ESPINA, Julius A .

341. ESPONILLA, Ryan P .

342. ESTANISLAO, JR., Rizalino C .

343. ESTRADA, Lea S .

344. ESTRELLA, Anatoly N .

345. EVANGELISTA, Edmon B .

346. EVARDONE, Pearl Fatima L .

347. FABELLON, Katherina S .

348. FABIAN, Jocelyn T .

349. FABROS, Ari Vergil P .

350. FACULANAN, Jefferson T .

351. FACUN, Ramon D .

352. FELICIANO, Joseph Dexter M .

353. FERMO, Augusto P .

354. FERNANDEZ, Jamara Leigh C .

355. FERNANDEZ, John Dennis C .

356. FERNANDEZ, Joseph Christopher Y .

357. FERNANDEZ, March Jefferson M .

358. FERNIZ, Betsie A .

359. FEROLIN, Perr R .

360. FERRER, Kristine R .

361. FERRER, Sherwin C .

362. FLORES, Lyra Miragrace C .

363. FLORES, Reynaldo L .

364. FORTES, Gladys A .

365. FRANCISCO-LAO, Katrina Marie C .

366. FUYONAN, Milanie M .

367. GAANAN, JR., Eduardo Cezar D .

368. GABRIEL, Golda May D .

369. GAERLAN, Rosette S .

370. GALAN, Rene Rose DS.

371. GALIDO, Jeffrey P .

372. GALLEGA, Francis Avelyn B .

373. GALLEGO, Rhonalyn C .

374. GALLENERO, Sharmen D .

375. GAN, William Benson S .

376. GANDILLO, Alpha Faith A .

377. GARCIA, Aristeo Franklin M .

378. GARCIA, Enrico C .

379. GARCIA, Radney R .

380. GARCIA, Richard V .

381. GASPAR, Jervis A .

382. GATDULA, Isser Josef V .

383. GATMAITAN, Camille Bianca M .

384. GEMELO, Therese Xyza D .

385. GEMENTIZA, JR., Diosdado N .

386. GENDRANO, Jose Federico M .

387. GENERAL, Reuben Carlo O .

388. GENEROSO, Analie L .

389. GENIO, Jill Julie V .

390. GERALDEZ, Gia Angeli R .

391. GIALOGO, Edward G .

392. GO, Aldwill T .

393. GO, Eunice C .

394. GO, Gracyl Criste D .

395. GO, Lauren Niña A .

396. GO, Mary Jane L .

397. GO, Natasha M .

398. GOLOSINO, June Marianne E .

399. GOMEZ, Diana G .

400. GONZAGA, Rey Daniel N .

401. GONZALES, Geepee A .

402. GONZALES, Genevieve N .

403. GONZALES, Jose Paulo G .

404. GONZALES, Marvey Jay A .

405. GONZALES, Tristram E .

406. GONZALES-AGUINALDO, Melissa R .

407. GONZALES-DARADAL, Abigail M .

408. GORRA, Jypsie Rose M .

409. GRANDE, Joanalyn A .

410. GUADES, Jose Crisostomo Y .

411. GUARIN, Rudolph Val F .

412. GUEVARRA, Loralee Suzette A .

413. GULTIANO, Eudisan P .

414. GUMABUN, Leonardo Nick D .

415. GUTIERREZ, Margarita N .

416. GUTOC, Abraham A .

417. HALLARES, John Fred C .

418. HAUTEA, Kathryn Joy Q .

419. HAW, Charmaine Rose K .

420. HERNANDEZ, Ana Lynn O .

421. HERNANDEZ, Dave John T .

422. HERNANDEZ, Jeffrey C .

423. HERNANDEZ, Maria Rowena P .

424. HERRIN, Mark Andrew C .

425. HO, Aaron Jarveen O .

426. HO, Charlie L .

427. HOSAKA, Jenicka Elizabeth E .

428. HUMANGIT, Maria Carmen Hazel N .

429. IBARRA, Marvin B .

430. IFURUNG, Nina Diorella K .

431. IFURUNG, Viralysa E .

432. ILAGAN, Rowell D .

433. ILEDAN, Jerald I .

434. ILO, Cecille Marie D .

435. ILUSTRISIMO, Vanessa L .

436. INFANTE, Maria Katrina L .

437. INTERINO, Honey Lyn B .

438. ISON, Jayson Jay P .

439. ITCHON, Reyna Fe C .

440. JABINES, III, Arturo B .

441. JACINTO, Gino Carmine S .

442. JACOME, John R .

443. JADULCO, Francis A .

444. JALIT, Ruby Ann S .

445. JARAMILLA, Dennis L .

446. JAVELOZA, Eric B .

447. JAVIER, Filemon Ray L .

448. JAVIER, Geraldine F .

449. JAVIER, III, Francisco P .

450. JIMENEZ, Ma. Cecilia B .

451. JIMENEZ, Minerva A .

452. JIMENEZ-SERRANO, Ethylene Grace A .

453. JO, Arvin A .

454. JOAQUIN, Dyanne O .

455. JOBOCO, Christian Alexander A .

456. JOCOM, Allister Michael C .

457. JOSE, Frederick August I .

458. JOSE, Raphael Augusto I .

459. JUMAMIL, Gerard Joseph M .

460. JUPLO, Ember Jann M .

461. KASILAG, Andrei Josef Y .

462. KOTAKE, Hiroshi R .

463. LA CHICA, Justin Vincent J .

464. LABAGUIS, Alden Patrick C .

465. LABANDRIA, Julius D .

466. LABOR, Sheeherazadee A .

467. LABUGUEN, Eric O .

468. LABUGUEN, Rhyss William G .

469. LACAMBACAL, Maria Icel L .

470. LACANDAZO, Jamahlin D .

471. LADERA, Jairo M .

472. LAGAN, Ana Pia Amor M .

473. LAIDAN, Karym B .

474. LANDAYAN, Paula Danica B .

475. LANDICHO, Alvin B .

476. LAPE, Janice S .

477. LARAÑO, Melbian Jerome E .

478. LASMARIAS, Peter Elfred A .

479. LASTIMOSO, Fritz A .

480. LAURENTE, Ann Camille A .

481. LAUZON, Mario Ryan E .

482. LAVISTA, Honoriza Krystle M .

483. LAYGO, JR., Hospicio I .

484. LAYUS, Cecilia Maeve T .

485. LAZARO, Jose Miguel N .

486. LAZARO, Vladi Miguel S .

487. LEDESMA, Mariness L .

488. LEE, Bryan Vince M .

489. LEE, Gene Nicholas A .

490. LEGASPI, Warren-derick T .

491. LEJANO, Charles Albert R .

492. LEQUIN, Lloyd M .

493. LIBANG, Gabriela Andrea R .

494. LIBATIQUE, III, Reynaldo C .

495. LIBUNAO, Dennis G .

496. LIDUA, Randall F .

497. LIGUTAN, Leo J .

498. LIM, Alexander F .

499. LIM, Camille Alison D .

500. LIM, Dyan Danika G .

501. LIM, Emma Malou U .

502. LIM, Esther Claudine F .

503. LIM, Ruth Katherine K .

504. LIMBO, Leonardo Oliver F .

505. LIMPANGOG, Junella G .

506. LIMPASAN, Fahkriemar H .

507. LINAG, Christopher S .

508. LIPAR, Mark Anthony H .

509. LLESOL, Rey T .

510. LLIDO, Jc Ma. Rose B .

511. LLOREN, Julie G .

512. LLUZ, Hobert N .

513. LOABLE, Nestor A .

514. LOINAZ, Maria Del Carmen Beatriz L .

515. LOPEZ, Jake J .

516. LOPEZ, Lew Carlo C .

517. LORENZO, Christine F .

518. LOTERTE, Vitto Duart C .

519. LU, Jocelyn B .

520. LU, Kristi Fe Mari E .

521. LUCAS, Margie Joy F .

522. LUMANLAN, Jennifer R .

523. MACALALAD, Alpheus D .

524. MACALINO, Joel U .

525. MACASAET, JR., Virgilio I .

526. MACASERO, Richyl Marie A .

527. MADAMBA-MALAPITAN, Roxan D .

528. MADREDIJO, Aemilda B .

529. MADRIAGA, Jesus Malcolm G .

530. MADRIAGA, Ma. Charizma B .

531. MADRIAGA, III, Frederick Faustino A .

532. MADRID, Nicolina C .

533. MAGALE, Suerlan T .

534. MAGALGALIT, Noel B .

535. MAGALLANES, Jonathan P .

536. MAGALLANES, Mark Anthony Lester N .

537. MAGBIRAY-PE, Monica S .

538. MAGSINO-SILOTERIO, Maria Elizabeth G .

539. MAGTANAO-TAGUINOD, Minerva R .

540. MAGTURO, Gale Auzen M .

541. MAGUIWET-FAUSTINO, Grace P .

542. MAJAROCON, Mandy R .

543. MAKALINGGAN-GLORIA, Gemma E .

544. MAKILING, Raymond S .

545. MALADAGA, Arabella L .

546. MALANYAON, Vera Q .

547. MALASIG, Alvin C .

548. MALIHAN, Marjorie B .

549. MALIWAT, Anselma P .

550. MALIWAT, Dax P .

551. MALLARI, Ianne Joy R .

552. MAMAD, Norsary S .

553. MANA-AY, Gary Angel S .

554. MANALOTO, Grace A .

555. MANGALINDAN-ESCALA, Olive M .

556. MANGASAR, Lora L .

557. MANGROBANG, III, Jonas Cesar C .

558. MANGUBAT, Brenda D .

559. MANGUIAT, Maria Pia Caterina M .

560. MANLANGIT, Nikko Rey Aicetel T .

561. MANONGSONG, Marie Joyce P .

562. MARASIGAN, Cyril G .

563. MARCELO, Dave Francis G .

564. MARIANO, Maria Antoniette V .

565. MARTELINO, Dino B .

566. MARTIN, JR., Edward Cesar C .

567. MARTINEZ, Judith R .

568. MARTINEZ, Marinelli T .

569. MASANGCAY, Jay G .

570. MATEO, Arnel D .

571. MAURO, Adryan S .

572. MEDALLA, Meiline C .

573. MEDINA, Gerald Y .

574. MEDINA, Narcisa T .

575. MEJIA, Vina Grace B .

576. MENDIOLA, Peter Leo G .

577. MENDITA, Francis Roy F .

578. MENDOZA, Bernice C .

579. MENDOZA, Charlene Clara G .

580. MENDOZA, Jocelyn Q .

581. MENDOZA, Jowell A .

582. MENDOZA, Zeus Gamaliel S .

583. MENESES, Christian Gil P .

584. MERCADO, Maria Tara A .

585. MERCANO, Steve Paolo A .

586. MERIOLES, Paul Michael G .

587. MESA, Maria Monette F .

588. MIANE, Jojane D .

589. MIGRIÑO, Charlene Mae S .

590. MILITANTE, III, Reynaldo Gregorio T .

591. MIRALLES, Marvin M .

592. MISCALA, Melvin A .

593. MIÑOZA, Mary Hazel B .

594. MOLERA, Sheryl Anne S .

595. MONARES, Unalee R .

596. MONGE, Vanessa Joyce I .

597. MONTALBO, Jeremy P .

598. MONTEMAYOR, JR., Jose C .

599. MONTEROLA, Janice P .

600. MONTES, Lemuel R .

601. MORALES, Mitzele Veron L .

602. MORALES, JR., Jesus Emmanuel O .

603. MUNZING, Susan A .

604. MUSICO, Keith Andrew G .

605. MUSONG, Richard Joseph R .

606. NABUNAT, JR., Maurice C .

607. NACAR, Jansen T .

608. NACILLA, Elvin Kein M .

609. NAJERA, JR., Jose A .

610. NAPAY-LITUSQUEN, Jean S .

611. NAVARRO, Michael Jourdan J .

612. NEPOMUCENO, Jonathan Francis C .

613. NG, Edison L .

614. NG, Jacob T .

615. NICDAO, Katrina Myra M .

616. NICOL, Ma. Donna Marcy B .

617. NOCOM, Hans Chester T .

618. NONATO, Regina Ann L .

619. NUDO, John Joenelle V .

620. NUESTRO, Juan Carlos P .

621. OBERIO, Charmagne Joie T .

622. OBLIGAR, Norhan C .

623. OCAMPO, Darwin S .

624. OCCIANO, Salvador Justino E .

625. ODI, Athenie Laarni S .

626. OI, Michico Rizza G .

627. OLA, Winnie Fred C .

628. OLARTE, Theodeus M .

629. OLAVERE, Erwin N .

630. OLBES, Renato P .

631. OMAR, Sorayda M .

632. OMELIO, JR., George C .

633. ONDA, Amie Rose L .

634. ONDI, Rey Mar G .

635. ONG, Ferlyn C .

636. OPERIANO, Aimee Joy B .

637. ORBE, Joanna Lyn P .

638. ORDOÑEZ, Levy P .

639. ORIG, Esperanza Caridad A .

640. ORPILLA, Julius G .

641. ORTEGA, Pinky D .

642. ORTIGUERRA, Marcel M .

643. ORTIZ, Martin Iñigo C .

644. ORTIZ, Rotela Fatima A .

645. ORTUA, Maria Christina C .

646. PACO, Michelle U .

647. PACURIBOT, Ban Mikhael C .

648. PADATE, Danieza Julaidah J .

649. PADATE, Wallad Abdani J .

650. PADILLA, Maria Vinina Bonita A .

651. PADLAN, Darwin Troy J .

652. PADLAN, Jay Vincent S .

653. PADRE, JR., Edgardo T .

654. PAGDANGANAN, Joeffrey G .

655. PAJARON, Jose Marie N .

656. PAJE, Scarlet Joy C .

657. PALAYON, Jethro M .

658. PALER, Paula Shena P .

659. PAMMIT, Oliver Gem C .

660. PANAHON, Emmar Benjoe B .

661. PANALIGAN, Marjorie B .

662. PANCHO, Jose Carlo C .

663. PANELO, JR., Salvador Paolo A .

664. PANLILIO, Carmina Marie R .

665. PANTI, Dante W .

666. PAPANDAYAN, Omar Camal G .

667. PARADA, Williamore P .

668. PARCIA, Charls Mark B .

669. PARIDO, Ma. Pelisa Corazon S .

670. PASIONA, Brix A .

671. PAYOT, Junefe G .

672. PAÑO, Diana Abigail A .

673. PELLAZAR, Brian B .

674. PENDINATAR, Aisa L .

675. PERALTA, Jeffrey P .

676. PERALTA, Siena Karen DG.

677. PEREZ, Ryan Romeo P .

678. PEREZ, Tara Tsarina B .

679. PEÑA, Rita Carla Fernandina O .

680. PEÑAFLORIDA, Kay Angela R .

681. PICCIO, Kathleen Joy C .

682. PICHAY, III, Benedict R .

683. PINEDA, Jesse Kenneth B .

684. PIZARRO, Abigail Camille A .

685. PLETE, Marianne P .

686. PO, Christine Glaisa S .

687. POBLACION, Krizelle Marie F .

688. POBLACION, Samantha L .

689. PULA, Sahlee T .

690. PULAYAN, Sherwin Peter O .

691. PUNO, Reginald Anton J .

692. PUNO, Theresa Marie C .

693. PUNZALAN, Kristine F .

694. PURUGGANAN, Kristin-zia B .

695. QUAZON, Paolo Justino T .

696. QUEJANO, Paolo Dominique O .

697. QUERRER, Anna Marie T .

698. QUILANG, Jennica M .

699. QUILOÑA, Zoraida P .

700. QUINAY, Pamela Elaine B .

701. QUINTO, Emma F .

702. QUINTO, Fitz Gerald G .

703. QUINTOS, Jay Antonell M .

704. QUIOC, Noven Joseph P .

705. QUISMORIO, Leo Angelo A .

706. RABE, Merryl Ann Hermila M .

707. RABON, Janine A .

708. RAFALES, Wilfredo B .

709. RAMA, Globel N .

710. RAMA, Mikel F .

711. RAMA, Tara Triztina C .

712. RAMEL, Ava Mari F .

713. RAMENTO, IV, Serafin L .

714. RAMOS, Archibald S .

715. RAMOS, George Ramil C .

716. RAMOS, Ma. Josephine M .

717. RAMOS, Ronald Allan D .

718. RANARA, Ruth D .

719. RANCES, III, Renato Ramon B .

720. RAÑESES, Ben John B .

721. REGAL, Miguel Antonio S .

722. REGOSO, Janice C .

723. REGUETA, Shyr Phoebe F .

724. REGUNTON, Katrina Gladys G .

725. REMEDIO, Irish Dwight L .

726. RETUYA, Niño Rey B .

727. REVIL, Jo Kristine C .

728. REYES, Alessandra Maria Anna Gloria O .

729. REYES, Alex Miguel P .

730. REYES, Catherine S .

731. REYES, Felix Conrad B .

732. REYES, Gerald James B .

733. REYES, Jan Manuelle

734. REYES, John Dominee A .

735. REYES, John Erwin A .

736. REYES, Lili-mae T .

737. REYES, Margaret Joyce M .

738. REYES, Mark Wilfred M .

739. REYES, Norly P .

740. REYES, III, Felipe Joaquin A .

741. REYES, JR., Isidro Martin F .

742. REYNALDO, Suzette R .

743. RICALDE, Rowena R .

744. RIEZA, Danielle Marie S .

745. RIMANDO, Clarence B .

746. RIVERA, Yvonne Marie A .

747. RIVERO, III, Roberto A .

748. RIÑOS, Shiela A .

749. ROCAFORT, Regulus R .

750. RODRIGUEZ, Christian Patrick S .

751. RODRIGUEZ, Francis Jerome V .

752. RODRIGUEZ, Josefina S .

753. RODRIGUEZ, Paolo Manuel T .

754. RODULFO, Vivien Leigh S .

755. ROMERO, Rafael Al D .

756. ROMULO, Mikhail G .

757. RONCALES, Gretchelyn G .

758. ROQUE, II, Rosalio D .

759. ROSALES, Robert H .

760. ROSARIO, Jearemmy S .

761. ROSARIO, Resida Rose T .

762. ROSAUPAN, Daniel T .

763. ROUX, Alma Jean Ganayo L .

764. ROXAS, Liberty D .

765. ROXAS, JR., Alan Maximilian Y .

766. RUBLICO, Roberto S .

767. RUFIN-CAIRO, Maricel C .

768. RULE, Eileen D .

769. RUPERTO, Ramon Antonio A .

770. SABIO, Jose Conrado Barker C .

771. SACO, Ronaldo B .

772. SACPA, Allan C .

773. SALANDANAN, Irish Krystle S .

774. SALAVANTE, Joanne P .

775. SALAZAR, Francisco Domingo Pascua L .

776. SALCEDO, Leandro B .

777. SALENDAB, Badr E .

778. SALGADO, Sabrina Gretchen D .

779. SALILIN, Arnan Amor P .

780. SALINAS, Stephen Ivan M .

781. SALIPSIP, Darren L .

782. SALISE, Rhys Hywel N .

783. SALOM, Kristoffer Bryan L .

784. SALONGA, Regina S .

785. SALUNAT, Blossom Joy V .

786. SALVADOR, Ralph Jerome D .

787. SALVAHAN, Jon Paulo V .

788. SALVOSA, Paolo R .

789. SAM, Rizza Mae H .

790. SAMBAJON, John Zernan T .

791. SAMONTE, Gerald Joseph H .

792. SAMONTE, John Paul T .

793. SAMPANA, JR., Alfonso G .

794. SAMSON, Ramon Miguel C .

795. SAN BUENAVENTURA, Maidy S .

796. SAN JUAN, Bryan A .

797. SAN JUAN, Sara Jei L .

798. SAN LUIS, Sophia Monica V .

799. SANTIAGO, Edlyn Margaret C .

800. SANTIAGO, Ryan Erik C .

801. SANTIAGO, Vesmind T .

802. SANTIAGO, JR., Roberto T .

803. SANTOS, Daryll Matthew T .

804. SANTOS, Sandra Jill S .

805. SANTOS, II, Honorio R .

806. SANTOS, JR., Emelito O .

807. SANTOS, JR., Roberto K .

808. SARANGAYA, Mary Joyce M .

809. SARAUM, Michelle Kristine D .

810. SARAUSOS, Janine J .

811. SAREMI, Kurush R .

812. SARENAS, Francesca Lois V .

813. SARIA, Eva Christine I .

814. SARITA, Jacky T .

815. SARMIENTO, Glaiza G .

816. SARMIENTO, Patrick P .

817. SARMIENTO, JR., Conrado R .

818. SARSABA, Ayn U .

819. SASTINE, Edda Marie M .

820. SASUMAN, Carl Vincent D .

821. SAVELLANO, Charmaine Joy R .

822. SEACHON, Art Ryan L .

823. SEBIDO, John Paul L .

824. SEGUIT, John Ryan E .

825. SEIJO, Edward Jason P .

826. SERGIO, Gerald C .

827. SERRANO, Czarina Grace A .

828. SEÑGA, Francesca Lourdes M .

829. SHALIM, Faye Miriam T .

830. SHONTOGAN, Genevieve M .

831. SICAT, Melissa Ann B .

832. SICO, Michael Angelo G .

833. SIMBULAN, Reuben Antonio A .

834. SIMON, Robin P .

835. SINGZON, JR., Cesareo Antonio S .

836. SINON, Elvamay M .

837. SISON, Eva Marie M .

838. SISON, Ryan Donviv C .

839. SISON, III, Maximo Paulino T .

840. SO, Ralph David D .

841. SOLANO, Marc Gregory M .

842. SOLIVA, Peter Paul A .

843. SONGUITAN, Olive Ruth A .

844. SORIA, Ma. Maharani Liwaya P .

845. SORIA, Marinheide B .

846. SORIANO, Karl William Louise L .

847. SORIANO, Paolo T .

848. STA. ANA, Erwin D .

849. STA. MARIA, Karen Kaye M .

850. SUAN, Lordan G .

851. SULLA, Ronald Jose C .

852. SUMCAD, Antoniette K .

853. SUMONGCAD, Elsie B .

854. SUNGA, Johana T .

855. SUPERIO, Leoncio H .

856. SUSTENTO, Rex S .

857. SY, Candice Niña Marie O .

858. SY, Marianne Camille C .

859. SZE, Louie Brian R .

860. TABIRARA, Glacy S .

861. TABOTABO, Bianca Chloe S .

862. TADENA, II, Reuben A .

863. TADEO, Domer B .

864. TAGALAG, Bernadette V .

865. TAGUDIN, JR., Joseph T .

866. TAGUINOD, Carol B .

867. TALIPING, JR., Rogelio R .

868. TALON, Krizia Katrina Leanne D .

869. TAMBIS, Mariedel P .

870. TAMONDONG, Blessalyn M .

871. TAN, Candy N .

872. TAN, Elaine G .

873. TAN, Jean Cathleen Y .

874. TAN, Luis Martin V .

875. TAN, Manuel Anthony S .

876. TAN, Rolan L .

877. TANCHICO, Reizel Ann A .

878. TANYAG, Lauren Rose R .

879. TAVERNER, Marianne S .

880. TAWAY, IV, Gil G .

881. TE, Wryan Martin C .

882. TECSON, Ma. Christina E .

883. TEJIDA, III, Guillermo C .

884. TEMPLADO, Ruby R .

885. TEMPROSA, Francis Tom F .

886. TENORIO, JR., Orlando F .

887. TETANGCO, Anna Teresa G .

888. TEVES, Patrick Ryan G .

889. TIANSAY, Kristoffer L .

890. TIROL, Roxanne Rhea G .

891. TIU, Kenneth R .

892. TIUSECO, Manolito T .

893. TOBIANO, Irish L .

894. TOBOSO, Stephen Jacon M .

895. TOLDANES, Cora Antonnette B .

896. TOLENTINO, Aaron S .

897. TOLENTINO, Florence O .

898. TOLENTINO, Paolo Carlo C .

899. TOPACIO, Vicente Jaime M .

900. TORRECAMPO, Charlene M .

901. TORREJA, Richard P .

902. TORRES, Christopher John A .

903. TORRES, Jesus G .

904. TORREVILLAS, Manuelindo Josef A .

905. TOYOKAN, JR., Simon K .

906. TRESVALLES, Tristan Frederick L .

907. TRIA, Grace Sarah S .

908. TROJILLO, Ernelson Q .

909. TUAZON, Shirley C .

910. TUBLAN, Benzon C .

911. TUGADE, Jose Arturo M .

912. TUGDAY, Carmi Czarina V .

913. TULAGAN, Glaiza L .

914. TULAY, Michael Samuel C .

915. TUMALA, Dindo A .

916. TUPAS, Keneth P .

917. TURLA, Dodie O .

918. UJANO, Shella T .

919. ULIBAS, Maria Karen Riza B .

920. UMALI, Al Matthew P .

921. UMALI, Mildred Yovela S .

922. UNO, Mark Cyrus C .

923. UY, Edwin Alden V .

924. UY, Joan Marie W .

925. UY, Jonathan Paul T .

926. UY, Krystal Lyn T .

927. UY, Phillip Francis M .

928. UY, Rachel T .

929. UY, Ryan M .

930. VALDERRAMA, Maricef F .

931. VALDEZ, II, Melquiades Marcus N .

932. VALENCIA, Dianeth L .

933. VALIENTE, Ryan Christian M .

934. VALMONTE, Joseph Alden H .

935. VARGAS, Maria Theresa Amylita B .

936. VASIG, Elyrhey Cesar R .

937. VEGA, Joseph S .

938. VEHEMENTE, Paul R .

939. VELASQUEZ, Mae Kirsten R .

940. VELO, Eileen T .

941. VELOSO, Larri-nil G .

942. VER, Kathlyn R .

943. VERA CRUZ, Philip Josef T .

944. VERGARA, Don Immanuel V .

945. VIBAL, Reynante B .

946. VILCHES-MEDINA, Imee G .

947. VILLAGRACIA, Jayvee E .

948. VILLALUZ, Alpheus T .

949. VILLAMAYOR, III, Don Briccio F .

950. VILLANUEVA, Don D .

951. VILLANUEVA, Gabriel S .

952. VILLANUEVA, Jerusha O .

953. VILLANUEVA, Kip Francis P .

954. VILLANUEVA, Teresa S .

955. VILLARIN, Erwin Glenn Q .

956. VILLAVERT, Francez Vanessa N .

957. VILLEGAS, Jan Freeman C .

958. VILORIA, Jumar A .

959. VILORIA, JR., Gil P .

960. VINIEGRA, Carmeline Q .

961. VINLUAN, Aries DM.

962. VISTA, Oriel C .

963. VIZCARRA, JR., Jose M .

964. YAMAMOTO, Ma. Eliza Camille B .

965. YAMBAO, Carmela C .

966. YAMBOT, Maria Cristina P .

967. YANGO, Rafael G .

968. YAP, Philip Hussien B .

969. YAP, Warren Jeffrey B .

970. YEE, Zeus Izzy T .

971. YLANAN, Medrobel P .

972. YONG-GABON, Ma. Daryl Q .

973. YPANTO, Dexterius John N .

974. YU, Charlene Anne G .

975. YU, Cherlynne G .

976. YU, Gerald R .

977. YUSON, Giancarlo L .

978. ZAMORA, Fatima Anne C .

979. ZUBELDIA, Joel B .

980. ZULUETA, Maryrose J .

981. ZULUETA, JR., Leonardo C .

982. ZUÑIGA, Patricia Lauren D .

PREPARING FOR THE 2011 BAR EXAMS AND BEYOND

I. CHANGES IN THE 2011 BAR EXAMINATIONS

A. FIRST APPROVED CHANGE: REDEFINE COVERAGE

The current practice is to define the coverage of the bar exams by naming the laws that each subject will cover. For example, in Civil Law the coverage is –

1. The Civil Code of the Philippines
2. The Family Code
3. The Domestic Adoption Act
4. The Inter-Country Adoption Act
5. The Property Registration Decree,
6. Conflict of Laws
7. Supreme Court decisions touching the above

Everybody insists that questions in bar exams, to be reasonable, must stick to the “basics.” But does the above list tell you the “basics” of Civil Law?

It does not. The description of coverage by just naming the law is too general. Examiners and
students are unsure of what questions to expect. Consider some examples from past bar exams:
True or False. The Howey Test states that there is an investment contract when a person
invests money in a common enterprise and is led to expect profits primarily from the efforts of
others. 1%

Would you have predicted this kind of question? Another example:

In several policy addresses extensively covered by media since his appointment on December
21, 2005, Chief Justice Artemio V. Panganiban vowed to leave a judiciary characterized by “four
Ins” and to focus in solving the “four ACID” problems that corrode the administration of justice
in our country.

Explain this “four Ins” and “four ACID” problems. 2.5%

Would you have anticipated this? Here is another one:

Where is the seat of the International Court of Justice? 1%
How many are its members? 1 %
What is the term of their office? 1 %
Who is its incumbent president? 1 %
What is his/her nationality? 1 %

Is this basic in public international law?

Does knowing the answers qualify one to practice law? Why did these kind of questions creep into
the bar examinations? It is because there has been no prior attempt to determine what constitutes the
basics of law practice.

In the past, particularly the pre-war era, there were only a few laws and jurisprudence making it
unnecessary to define the basics of law practice. But our laws and jurisprudence have since grown
enormously. Describing coverage by enumerating the laws has made the determination of what is basic a
hazardous guessing game. Examinees are forced to memorize trivial details, lest these be asked in the bar
exams. Fear of the unknown dissipates the energies and time of candidates and takes them away from the
really important and basic matters.

To address this need, coverage shall be drawn up by topics and sub-topics rather than by just stating
the covered law.

The test for including a topic or sub-topic in the coverage of the bar exams is whether it covers laws,
doctrines, principles and rulings that a new lawyer needs to know to begin his practice. After all, the
objective of the bar exams is to determine who among law graduates are fit to practice law. For example,
in Political Law, rather than say that the exam will cover the Constitution of the Philippines, it will name
the important topics and sub-topics under the Constitution. Thus:

POLITICAL LAW

Bill of Rights
Equal Protection
Meaning
Valid Classification
Substantial distinctions
Relevance to purpose
Duration
Applicability to all
Double Jeopardy
Valid Complaint
Competent Court
Valid Plea
Termination of case
Prosecution’s appeal
Same offense
Supervening event
Inseparable offenses

Even the description of coverage by topics and sub-topics cannot be too generalized, like this:

MERCANTILE LAW

x x x

Intellectual Property
General provisions
Patents
Trademarks
Copyrights
x x x

The description is too general. The Intellectual Property Code has 241 sections that include
administrative matters. It would be unreasonable to assume that all the provisions of the Intellectual
Property Code may be regarded as basic materials for beginning practitioners when their potential clients’
rights are affected only by a few of such provisions.

The U.P. Law Center is convening the country’s leading reviewers and lecturers to draw up a
proposed coverage of the 2011 bar exams per law subject by topics and sub-topics. When approved,
these new definitions of coverage will be disseminated early to enable the current fourth year law students
to focus their review on what is basic and stay away from the non-essentials.

Thus, the first approved change: Redefine Coverage.

B. SECOND APPROVED CHANGE: MEASURE KNOWLEDGE OF LAW AND ITS
APPLICATIONS THROUGH MCQ EXAMS

The mandate of the Constitution is for the Supreme Court to promulgate rules concerning admission
to the practice of law. The Supreme Court’s duty then is to establish by rules the means for determining
who may be admitted to the practice of law. And to fairly practice law, the examinee should:

1. Know the law and its applications; and
2. Be capable of practicing it.

The bar exams shall test the examinee’s working knowledge of the law and its applications. The key
word is “working” as distinguished from “idle” knowledge or knowledge for the sake of knowing, like a
lawyer knowing the circumference of the earth.

Does the existing essay-type of bar exams correctly measure the bar examinee’s level of knowledge
of the law and its applications? Many have complained that the essay type of exams suffers from the
following problems:

1. The bar exams follow the essay-type classroom model. Example: 10 questions in a 2-hour exam
in Property. Applied to the bar exams, only 20 questions could ideally be asked for a 4-hour
exam in all of civil law. This cannot hit a significant cross-section of such law. The desire to
squeeze in as many essay questions as possible (10 items with 5 to 7 sub-items) has compelled
examinees to give sloppy and quickie answers.

2. Great emphasis is placed on identifying the examiner to narrow down the guessing on questions
that will be asked.

3. An eloquently presented but incorrect answer could gain a good mark.

4. Uniformity and fairness in correction is not assured because about 6,000 notebooks have to be
corrected in 5 months. Correctors scan the answers rather than read to appreciate them.

5. The mood of the correctors and their varying levels of attentiveness jeopardize judgment and
unfairly influence grading.

Multiple choice questions (MCQs) type of exam is a method of choice for qualifying professionals,
including lawyers, in the United States and all over the world because of their proven reliability. The

MCQ type of exam has of course the following disadvantages:

1. It does not measure communication skills.
2. It is not a reliable gauge of true or ideal knowledge, fine reasoning and creative thinking.
3. Developing well-constructed MCQs is time-consuming and difficult.

These disadvantages, however, can be overcome by exercising care in drawing up MCQs and by
providing for a mix of MCQ and essay types of exams. Furthermore, the advantages of MCQs, on the
other hand, are weighty:

1. Since correction can be done by scanning machine, the result can be known in one or two days.
2. Correction is objective since every question has one definite answer. Hand writing, no problem.
3. It permits a wider scope of topics since the examiner can ask as many as 100 questions in a 1 ½ hour exam.
4. Mastery of subject is encouraged because of the difficulty of distinguishing between a correct and a nearly-correct answer.
5. Since questions are straightforward, gaps in knowledge can be easily identified, helping schools adopt remedies.
6. Since the answers are given, understanding, not memorization, is required for a correct choice of answer.

The bar exams team, assisted by experts, will monitor and evaluate the construction and selection of appropriate MCQs.

Thus, the second approved change: measure knowledge of law and its applications through MCQ Exams.

C. THIRD APPROVED CHANGE: LAWYERING SKILLS ESSAY EXAM

Of course, it is not enough for the Court to find out if an examinee knows the law and its
applications. Determining whether the examinee has the basic skills required in the practice of law is just
as important. Thus, the Supreme Court shall give separate essay-type of exams dedicated to determining
the examinee’s lawyering skills. He will be presented with one or two legal-dispute situations in each law
subject. He will then prepare a paper, like a memorandum or a decision, for the side of the dispute that he
chooses to uphold or defend.

This will test the examinee’s skills in writing in English, sorting out the relevant facts, identifying
the issue or issues, organizing his thoughts, constructing his arguments, and persuading his reader to his
point of view. It will not be graded for technically right or wrong answers, but for the quality of the
examinee’s legal advocacy.

The skills exams will help measure depth of learning and true intelligence. The passing standard for
correction will be work expected of a beginning practitioner, not a seasoned lawyer. Since this kind of
exam will be given in all subjects, 8 examiners will be assessing the examinee’s lawyering skills. Their
collective judgment ought to minimize the subjectivity of the correction.

Thus, the third approved change: dedicated essay-type exams to measuring lawyering skills.

These changes are the product of consultations with the law schools, a major stakeholder in bar
exams. We have a Resolution from the Philippine Association of Law Schools fully endorsing these
changes. The law schools undertake to prepare their present fourth year students for these kinds of exams
in 2011.

To summarize, the three approved changes are:

1. Redefine coverage.
2. Measure knowledge of law and its applications through MCQ exams.
3. Dedicate essay-type exams to measuring lawyering skills.

Thus, beginning in 2011, the bar examinations shall be of two kinds:

1. Multiple Choice Questions that will measure the examinee’s knowledge of law and its applications; and

2. Essay-Type exams that will measure the examinee’s lawyering skills.

II. PREPARING FOR THE MCQ BAR EXAMINATIONS

A. MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTIONS IN THE 2011 BAR EXAMS

1. What makes a good MCQ exam?

The multiple choice questions (MCQs) should be able to measure the level of the examinee’s
preparedness for the work of a lawyer. But it will be valid only to the extent that it can reach this
objective. Exams of this kind in the classrooms are encouraged to prepare the students for the bar exams.

2. Weight given to each law subject:

Political Law — 15%
Labor Law — 10%
Civil Law — 15%
Taxation — 10%
Mercantile Law — 15%
Criminal Law — 10%
Remedial Law — 20%
Legal Ethics/Forms — 5%

3. What specific competences will the MCQs measure?
a. The examinee’s knowledge of the law and its basic principles and his ability to recall them (20%);
b. His ability to understand the meaning and significance of the law and its basic principles (40%); and
c. His ability to analyze legal problems and provide solutions to them (40%).

4. Preparing an MCQ item.1 Prepare the STEM of the MCQ item, which presents the problem –
The jurisdiction of courts are determined by – (STEM)
Add to the STEM a list of possible options or answers. Of these options, only one will be correct.
The jurisdiction of courts are determined by – (stem)
A. Congress. (correct choice)

The others will be incorrect but plausible options called “distractors.” What is a PLAUSIBLE
option? It is an option that appears to be correct and acceptable. Parang pwede rin pero mali. It is an
option that can mislead an examinee who is unsure of his answer. If you provide patently wrong options,
you practically give away the answer. Thus, the question fails to assess the examinee’s knowledge and
ability.

The jurisdiction of courts are determined by – (stem)
A. Congress. (correct choice)
B. The Supreme Court. (distractor)
C. The Judicial and Bar Council. (distractor)
D. The Court Administrator. (distractor)
The stem may be presented either as a question—
Who determines the jurisdiction of courts? (stem)
Or an incomplete statement—The jurisdiction of courts are determined by (stem)
The stem must present a clear and specific problem.
The jurisdiction of courts are— (this stem does not present a problem)
Improved:
The jurisdiction of courts are determined by—(this asks who determines the jurisdiction of courts)
A. Congress.
B. the Supreme Court.
C. the Judicial and Bar Council.
D. the Court Administrator.

B. THE THREE COMPETENCES MEASURED BY MCQS
1. Knowledge and recall.
When you want to find out if the examinee knows a specific law or principle, write down such
specific law or principle as your “proposition” or the subject matter of your MCQ. Thus:
Proposition:
The majority age begins at the age of 18.
The first part of your proposition will be your STEM while the second part will be your correct
answer. Then add 3 distractors and mix it with the correct option. Thus:

The majority age begins at the age of (stem)
A. 21 (distractor)
B. 20 (distractor)
C. 18 (correct option)
D. 16 (distractor)
This will test the examinee’s knowledge of what the legal majority age is and his ability to recall
such fact.
Here are other examples of “knowledge and recall” MCQs:
Proposition:
A Court of Appeals Justice may solemnize marriage anywhere in the Philippines.

MCQ:
Who may solemnize marriage anywhere in the Philippines?
A. A Consul-general
B. A Court of Appeals justice
C. A ship captain
D. A military commander
* * *
Proposition:
To be enforceable, a contract must comply with the Statute of Frauds when by its terms it is
to be performed beyond a year from its making.
MCQ:
To be enforceable, when must a contract comply with the Statute of Frauds? When by its
terms it is to be performed beyond
A. a year from its making.
B. 5 years from its making.
C. a year from its ratification.
D. 5 years from its ratification.
* * *

Proposition:
The Revised Penal Code may be enforced outside the jurisdiction of the Philippines when
one commits a crime against national security.

MCQ:
The Revised Penal Code may be enforced outside the jurisdiction of the Philippines when
A. one commits an offense on any ship or airship.
B. one introduces into the Philippines any counterfeit coin.
C. a public officer enters into a bigamous marriage.
D. one commits a crime against national security.
* * *
Proposition:
Congress may submit to the electorate the question of calling a constitutional convention by
a majority vote of all its Members.

MCQ:
What vote is required for Congress to submit to the electorate the question of calling a
constitutional convention?
A. A vote of two-thirds of all its Members.
B. A vote of two-thirds of a quorum.
C. A majority vote of all its Members.
D. A majority vote of a quorum.

A knowledge and recall item is easy to prepare since it evolves from a simple statement of a
provision of law or a legal principle. But this skill is the lowest in the ladder of skills for new lawyers. It
is sheer memorization. The bar exams will devote only 20% of all MCQ items to this kind of MCQs.

2. Understanding
A higher level of skills for a beginning practitioner is understanding. This type tests whether the
examinee truly understands a specific law or principle. And he can show this if he can correctly relate the
law or principle to specific situations. For example:

Proposition:
A warrantless search is valid when the search is made by policemen at a COMELEC
checkpoint.

MCQ:
A warrantless search is valid when the search is made by A. a customs officers
at the home of a known smuggler.
B. anti-drug enforcers.
C. policemen at a COMELEC checkpoint.
D. NBI agents looking for a bomb at a mall.

This item tests the examinee’s understanding of what a warrantless search means. A “warrantless
search” is search made of persons or properties without a judicial search warrant.
This kind of MCQ is a grade more difficult to prepare but measures a higher level of ability than just
knowledge and recall. To test the examinee’s understanding of “warrantless search,” he is required to
choose from the four options the situation that comes under such concept.

When preparing an MCQ item on the examinee’s “UNDERSTANDING” of a specific law or
principle, begin by writing down your proposition – the matter you want to turn into an MCQ. For
example:

Proposition:
An “antecedent collateral evidence” of a bank robbery that several accused committed
would be the kinship among them.
This item tests the examinee’s understanding of a concept in Evidence. An “antecedent collateral
evidence” proves a past event to show the likelihood of a subsequent event taking place. He must choose
the situation that comes under such concept.

MCQ:
Which of the following constitutes antecedent collateral evidence of a bank robbery that
several accused committed?
A. The act of the lookout during the robbery.
B. The kinship among them.
C. The amount missing from the bank’s vault
D. The fingerprints on the teller’s counter.

How does “knowledge and recall” differ from “understanding?” Example:

Knowledge and Recall
A justifying circumstance makes an act
A. three degrees less severe .
B. exempt from criminal liability.
C. non-criminal. (merely restates the law)
D. pardonable.

Understanding
A justifying circumstance is exemplified by
A. a retreat from aggression.
B. a pre-emptive blow.
C. a counter blow. (illustrates meaning)
D. a good intention.
Other examples that test “understanding”:

Proposition:
Real or object evidence is authenticated by showing that it is what it is claimed to be.

MCQ:
Real or object evidence is authenticated by showing
A. who owns it.
B. that it is what it is claimed to be.
C. how the evidence got to court.
D. similar or like objects.
* * *

Proposition:
An uninterrupted possession for a statutory period of time without the need of just title and
good faith are requisites for extraordinary acquisitive prescription.

MCQ:
An uninterrupted possession for a statutory period of time without the need of just title and
good faith are requisites for
A. laches.
B. prescription of actions.
C. ordinary acquisitive prescription.
D. extraordinary acquisitive prescription.

The bar exams will devote 40% of all MCQ items to questions that test the examinee’s
understanding of the law.

3. Analysis and Solution
Here, you test the examinee’s ability to (a) analyze a given problem, (b) determine the law or
principle that applies to such problem, and (c) solve the same.
To construct your MCQ, begin by stating your chosen proposition. For example:

Proposition:
Sonny, a Filipino citizen obtained a divorce in Canada from his wife, Lulu, also a Filipino
citizen. Is the divorce valid and binding? (facts of the problem)
It is not. (answer to the problem)

The reason is that Philippine law, which is binding upon Filipinos wherever they may be,
does not permit absolute divorce. (the applicable rule)

If you analyze this, it is a typical essay-type exam with the answer and reason given here. Actually,
this was a bar exam item a few years back. You can convert it into an MCQ item by using the facts of the
problem as your STEM, thus:

Sonny, a Filipino citizen, obtained a divorce in Canada from his wife, Lulu, also a Filipino
citizen. Is the divorce valid and binding? (This will be your stem.)

You then add to your stem, as one of your options, the answer to the problem and the reason for
such answer:

Sonny, a Filipino citizen, obtained a divorce in Canada from his wife, Lulu, also a Filipino
citizen. Is the divorce valid and binding?
It is not since Philippine law binds Filipinos abroad and it does not permit divorce.

Now add your distractors as alternate options, varying their locations:

MCQ:
Sonny, a Filipino citizen, obtained in a divorce in Canada from his wife, Lulu, also a
Filipino citizen. Is the divorce valid and binding?
A. It is not since Philippine law binds Filipinos abroad and it does not permit divorce.
B. It is since Philippine law does not operate in Canada.
C. It is not since Philippine law is recognized in Canada.
D. It is since international law demands local recognition of foreign acts.

Another example:

Proposition:
A person walks into a police station and declares that he has committed a crime before the
police could take him into custody. May his declaration be admitted against him? (the problem)
Yes since what is inadmissible are statements the accused made while under custodial
investigation before he could be forewarned of his rights. (the answer and short reason for it)

MCQ:
A person walks into a police station and declares that he has committed a crime before the
police could take him into custody. May his declaration be admitted against him?
A. No since he has not been forewarned of his rights to silence and to counsel.
B. Yes since he made his declaration before he could be taken into custody and investigated.
C. No since he has entered the police station and came within its jurisdiction.
D. Yes since he freely gave his declaration to the police.
* * *

Proposition:
In a case, a very old woman executed a will, witnessed by a friend, a cousin, and a notary
public. Is the will valid?

The will is invalid since it is a must that it be attested and subscribed by three or more
credible witnesses in the presence of the testator and of one another.

MCQ:
In a case, a very old woman executed a will. A friend, a cousin, and a notary public came to
witness the will. Due to old age she thumbmarked the will instead of signing it. The friend
signed the pages on the right margin, thinking it looked better. The cousin did not see this
because his eyes were on a painting that hanged on a nearby wall. Finally, the notary public
notarized the will.

The will is invalid because
A. the cousin looked away just as the friend was signing the will.
B. the testator failed to subscribe the will.
C. the friend signed at the right margin.
D. of lack of sufficient witnesses.

Note that, in the above, the stem or the facts of the problem also embodied the distractors.

Proposition:
A couple named their son Mario Lopez. But a confused clerk at the hospital registered his
name as Maria Lopez and his gender as female. Does the civil registrar have the authority tocorrect thechild’s name and gender on the birth certificate

No since the law authorizes administrative correction by the civil registrar only of clerical or
typographical error in an entry and/or change of first name or nickname.

MCQ:
A couple named their son Mario Lopez. But a confused clerk at the hospital registered his
name as Maria Lopez and his gender as female. The city civil registrar has authority to:
A. correct his name and gender.
B. correct his name but not his gender.
C. correct his gender but not his name.
D. indorse the case to court.
* * *

Proposition:
A decision states that the defendant is entitled to moral damages but its dispositive portion
did not carry an award of moral damages. The writ of execution, however, orders the defendant
to pay moral damages of P5,000. Must he comply?

He does not need to comply since it is the dispositive portion of the decision that controls.

MCQ:
A decision states that the defendant is entitled to moral damages but its dispositive portion
did not carry an award of moral damages. The writ of execution, however, orders the defendant
to pay moral damages of P5,000. Must he comply?
A. Yes since the body of the decision contains the justification for it.
B. No since it is the dispositive portion of the decision that controls.
C. Yes since the writ of execution affirms it.
D. No since the plaintiff needed to pay docket fee on the P5,000.

The examination shall devote 40% of all MCQ items in the bar exams to analysis-and-application
type of MCQs.

C. POINTERS IN THE CONSTRUCTION OF MCQS
1. The examiner can adjust the difficulty level of a test item by simply changing the distractors,
making them too close to the correct answer.2 You should, however, strive for moderate MCQs.

Poor:
A criminal action must be filed in the place where
A. the offense took place.
B. the accused resides.
C. the offended party resides.
D. the witness resides.

Improved:
A criminal action must be filed in the place where
A. the offense took place.
B. the accused was apprehended and detained.
C. the offended party resides.
D. the preliminary investigation took place.

2. The number of options may vary but, for the purpose of the bar and classroom exams, four
options would be ideal. This would give only a 25% probability of guessing the right answer. If the
examinee sticks to guessing, on the average he would get 25% correct answers, a sure failure.

3. The distractors should be plausible, not obviously wrong.3 A good way to create distractors is to
think of ways an examinee can possibly go wrong. Thus:

Poor:
Rape is sexual intercourse with the use of
A. foreplay
B. viagra
C. condom
D. force or intimidation.

Improved:
Rape is sexual intercourse with the use of
A. deceit
B. moral ascendance
C. intrigue
D. force or intimidation.

4. The main stem should clearly inform the examinee regarding what the problem is before he reads
his options.4

Poor:
The act of the police in placing the accused in a police line-up – (this statement of the stem
by itself does not present a clear problem)
A. violates his right against self-incrimination.
B. violates his right to counsel.
C. constitutes a valid police investigation procedure.
D. is valid conditioned on his being identified at the trial.

Improved:
The act of the police in placing the accused in a police line-up without his prior consent—
(this now presents a clear problem)
A. violates his right against self-incrimination.
B. violates his right to counsel.
C. constitutes a valid police investigation procedure.
D. is valid conditioned on his being identified at the trial.
5. Include as much of the data in the stem and keep the options as short as possible.5

Poor:
A warrantless search is valid -
A. when the search is made by customs officers at the home of a known smuggler.
B. when the search is made by anti-drug enforcers.
C. when the search is made by policemen at a COMELEC checkpoint.
D. when the search is made for a bomb at the mall by the NBI.

Improved:
A warrantless search is valid when it is made -
A. by customs officers at the home of a known smuggler.
B. by anti-drug enforcers.
C. by policemen at a COMELEC checkpoint for illegal firearms.
D. by the NBI for a bomb at the mall.

6. One of the advantages of MCQs is that you can ask many questions to cover a good cross-section
of a subject. You can do this only if you make your MCQs simple, clear and short. Do not complicate a
problem with unessential facts. Include in the stem only the facts needed to make the problem clear.6
Irrelevant materials in the stem cause confusion.

Poor:
The police nabbed two robbery suspects after a police informer fingered them. During the
investigation, the police officers succeeded in convincing the suspects to go with them to the scene
of the crime, accompanied by the press, to reenact how they committed the crime. Photos were
taken. Was the reenactment admissible evidence?
A. No since it amounts to waiver of right to silence without the advice of counsel.
B. Yes since the reenactment was voluntary.
C. No since it is irrelevant evidence.
D. Yes since the reenactment was unaccompanied by any statement from the suspects.

Why is this poorly writen? Since only the “reenactment” is being questioned, the stem contains too
many unnecessary data.

Improved:
The police nabbed two robbery suspects whom they convinced during the investigation to go
with them to the scene of the crime to reenact how they committed it. Is the reenactment
admissible in evidence?
A. No since it amounts to waiver of right to silence without the advice of counsel.
B. Yes since the reenactment was voluntary.
C. No since it is irrelevant evidence.
D. Yes since the reenactment was unaccompanied by any statement from the suspects.

7. Avoid using the negative in the stem since it often confuses the examinee. But the negative is
justified when it tests his knowledge or understanding of exceptions to rules. In the latter cases, be
creative in using the negative in the problem. Capitalize the negative word to emphasize it.7

Poor:
The Supreme Court will NOT entertain a constitutional question UNLESS it is
determinative of the case itself because
A. it would prejudice the administration of justice.
B. the separation of powers demands respect due the other departments.
C. the Court would not have acquired jurisdiction over the case.
D. there is no actual case or controversy that justifies such a review.

Improved:
The Supreme Court will entertain a constitutional question only if it is determinative of the
case itself because
A. it would prejudice the administration of justice.
B. the separation of powers demands respect due the other departments.
C. the Court would not have acquired jurisdiction over the case.
D. there is no actual case or controversy that justifies such a review.
* * *

Poor:
The bank deposit secrecy law bars all inquiries into a bank deposit. But it allows exceptions.
Which of the following does NOT belong to the exceptions?
A. Cases of impeachment.
B. Cases involving bribery.
C. Cases of bigamy.
D. Cases where the money involved is subject of litigation.

Improved:
The bank deposit secrecy law bars all inquiries into a bank deposit. A deposit may, however,
be looked into
A. after prior notice to the depositor.
B. upon court order in annulment of marriage cases.
C. in cases of impeachment.
D. on motion in a bribery case.

8. Be sure that the choices you provide has only one correct answer that experts would generally
agree on.8 In their desire to make distractors plausible, some writers would include more than one correct
answer or choices that remain unsettled among experts and authorities.

9. Give no unintentional clues.9

Poor:
To prove that Susan stabbed her husband Sergio, Pete testified that he heard Rico running
down the street, shouting excitedly, “Sinaksak daw ni Susan ang asawa niya!” Unfortunately (a
clue to a negative answer), Rico’s declaration is –
A. admissible as part of res gestae.
B. inadmissible as hearsay.
C. admissible as independently relevant statement.
D. inadmissible as a mere opinion.

10. Avoid grammatical inconsistencies.10

Poor:The law that will determine jurisdiction over a particular case is the law in force at the time
of
A. the cause of action accrued.
B. the filing of the action.
C. the issues in the action are joined.
D. the defendant receives the complaint.

11. Avoid length clues.11

Poor:
The right to be presumed innocent is NOT violated by a law that establishes a presumption
of guilt based on a certain fact proved provided that
A. the burden of proving his innocence is shifted to the accused only when there is a
reasonable connection between the fact proved and the fact presumed from it.
B. the nature of the crime permits it.
C. the accused has a chance to overcome it.
D. the law is not retroactive.

Improved:
The right to be presumed innocent is NOT violated by a law that establishes a presumption
of guilt based on a certain fact proved provided that
A. what is proved and presumed are reasonably connected.
B. the nature of the crime committed permits a reverse presumption.
C. the accused has ample opportunity to overcome the adverse presumption.
D. the law is not retroactive.

12. Avoid the options: none of the above or all of the above.12 It gives the impression that the
examiner could not create another distractor. It also encourages questions with no correct answers.
Instead of “none of the above,” just use another distractor which will enhance the quality of the question.

13. Make your questions topic specific, not a hodge-podge of several legal principles.

Poor:
Which of the following laws is unconstitutional?
A. A law requiring cabinet members to attend all congressional hearings upon
proper notice.
B. A law revoking all permits to carry firearms outside of one’s residence.
C. A law authorizing warrantless searches by customs officials.
D. A law providing for dual citizenship.

Asking which law is unconstitutional could cover any topic in Constitutional law. Option A is on
Section 22 of Article VI Legislative Department, while Option B is on undue deprivation of property,
Option C is on rights against warranless search and seizures and Option D is on citizenship. The choices
should be coherent in order to test an examinee’s knowledge on a particular topic.

Improved:
Which is unconstitutional for being an invalid exercise of police power?
A. A law prohibiting the use of motor vehicles on certain days of the week.
B. A law imposing rent control.
C. A law prescribing minimum standards for the practice of the engineering profession.
D. A law prohibiting the sale of cigarettes to young men and women ages 18 to 25.

14. Do not use “modified” true or false questions. They are time consuming and accomplishes
little. Example:
I. The practice of law is a right in the sense that a lawyer cannot be prevented from
practicing law except for valid reasons.
II. The practice of law is a privilege because it is limited to persons of good moral character
with special qualifications duly ascertained and certified.

Which of the following best describes the statements above?
A. Only statement I is true.
B. Only statement II is true.
C. Both statements are true.
D. None of the statements are true.

D. POINTERS IN IMPLEMENTING MCQ EXAMS IN THE CLASSROOM

We encourage you, especially those who are currently teaching review subjects, to use both types of
exams (MCQs and essays) for your classes. You need to acquaint your students with the changes in the
bar examinations that begin in 2011. You don’t want them surprised and unprepared. Constructing
MCQs is not difficult once you get the hang of it.

For a classroom examination we suggest that you start with at least 40 to 50 MCQs, eventually to
grow to 70 to 80, and one or two essay-type problems. If you use MCQs, correcting test booklets will no
longer be the great burden that it used to be. A trusted clerk can correct the MCQs, leaving you with only
the one or two essays to correct.

We suggest that you add ten MCQs to what you already have with each new semester until you are
able to build up a big collection of MCQs. Students have the tendency to stash away a copy of your
exams and build up a collection for future use. Take the following precautions:

1. Personally monitor the printing and xeroxing of your MCQs so no excess copies could be
made;
2. Require your students to mark their answers on the test questionaire itself so you can be sure
that they return all the MCQs to you after they have finished; and
3. Secure all used and unused question sheets for subsequent destruction.

To prevent copying between seatmates when the room is full prepare two sets, the second set beinga mere rearrangement of the first, and distribute them alternately to students on the same row.
To prepare for the 2011 bar exams, we invite you to send to the Supreme Court the MCQs you have
prepared and used for your classes. We will place these in a secure Central Depository of MCQs,
esentially as reference for developing bar exam MCQs. We are targeting not less than 1,000 MCQs per
bar subject for the 2011 bar exams. We will choose 100 MCQs per subject for the tests.
The MCQs you will send will give the Committee a reference for determining items of interest in
the academe. And, with a bit of reconstruction (like changing a few details of the stem and makingalterations in the distractors), such MCQs can acquire altered appearances, making them fair materials for
the bar examinations.

We suggest that you send us at least 50 MCQs in the subject you teach, 10 “knowledge and recall”
items, 20 “understanding” items, and 20 “analysis and solution” items. We will evaluate these and, if you
get it right, we will issue you a certificate as expert, first grade, in MCQ construction. This will qualify
you to lecture on the subject and place you in the list of potential bar examiners for the 2011 bar exams
and beyond.

III. PREPARING FOR ESSAY LAWYERING SKILLS EXAM
The second part of the bar exams, the essay type, is aimed at measuring the examinee’s lawyering
skills. It will cover one or two legal-dispute situations for which the examinee will be required to write a
paper.

For example, in Civil Law, the test might read like this:

Instructions:
Below is a hypothetical legal dispute.
a) Choose the side of the dispute that you want to uphold and defend; and
b) Prepare a trial memorandum in support of your position.
Do not write more than 4 arguments.

Suggestions:
a) Read the problem and get a sense of what the issues are;
b) Pick out the facts that are relevant to such issues;
c) Make a summary of the conflicting claims of the parties;
d) State the issues on which the resolution of the dispute will depend;
e) Prepare the arguments against the opposing side and the arguments in support of your own;
and
f) End with the relief you want, your prayer.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Alex sued Julio for the injury that his son Andy suffered through the fault of James. Julioresisted the action.

Andy made the following statement:
I am Andy, 10 years old, a grade four student. I am Alex’s son. I have a classmate
named James.

On July 7, I jumped from an adobe fence at the back of our barangay hall and
fractured my left leg. It was quite painful. I could not forget it. Someone called the
barangay captain and he took me to the hospital in a taxicab. The fence was rather tall. A
month ago, after school, James and I climbed and walked on top of it, trying to balance
ourselves as we went. We had previously done this when nobody was around and we
enjoyed the thrill of the heights. We always played together. We even swapped toys when
we were bored with what we had.

On that afternoon of July 7, while James and I were walking the fence, James
remarked to me that a policeman was coming towards us. I was quite terrified. I had been
told that policemen could put misbehaving children in jail. Actually, no policeman had
shown up at all where we were playing but James wanted to make fun of me. But, because
we never had a joke like it before, I really thought he was serious and would not make such
a dangerous joke. So I panicked and jumped from the fence to the ground.

Our teacher once said that James and I were good boys. But we were somewhat full of
play, she said. She had previously caught us playing games inside the classroom and sent
for our parents. The school was quite strict in the matter of order and discipline inside the
campus.

I stayed in the hospital for three days and the doctor had to put a cast on my leg. It
itched a lot afterwards. I walked with great difficulty and could not go back to school for at
least one week. It took a month before they removed the cast and I still walk awkwardly with
a slight pain to this day. I made this statement because my dad, Alex, wants to file an action
against James father, Julio for the injury and pain that I suffered.

For his part, James made the following statement:
I am James, 10 years old, and a grade four student. My dad’s name is Julio. He is a
caring father and always showed concern for his children.

Andy is my classmate and best friend. When Andy jumped from the fence at the back
of the barangay hall on the afternoon of July 7 and appeared hurt, I immediately went down
and called for help. The barangay chairman came and had Andy taken to the hospital. I
did not want Andy to get hurt at all.

Andy and I went together a lot and often played the games that young boys enjoyed,
even when at times these games became a little rough. We knew from what our parents have
been telling us, however, that we should be careful not to get hurt or to hurt others. Still, we
are growing boys and we had previously climbed the fence at the back of the barangay hall
before. What happened on the afternoon of July 7 was that we both climbed the fence after
school. The day was cloudy and cool. We walked on top of the fence and we enjoyed the
thrill that it offered. Andy teased me this time when I walked the fence, saying how slow and
afraid I was. This was of course not true because I was not afraid at all.

When Andy’s turn came, I also made a joke and said that a policeman was coming
towards us when this was not true. I did not expect Andy to be scared by what I said. I made
this statement at my dad’s request.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Additional suggestions:

It will be best if you can prepare a draft of your work on blank sheets that you have been
provided. This will permit you to freely edit your work, making marks, erasures, and insertions to
your satisfaction. Just make sure that you leave at least 20 minutes or so for transferring your
work to your examination notebook. One short bell will warn you that you have 20 minutes left.
When the bell rings twice to signal the end of the exam, your notebook will be collected whether
you are finished or not. Time pressure is a part of the exam.

You will not be graded for a technically right or wrong answer but for the quality of your
legal advocacy. The test is intended to measure your skills in:

a) Communicating in English — 20%
b) Sorting out the conflicting claims and extracting those facts that are relevant to the issue or
issues in the case — 15%
c) Identifying the issue or issues presented — 15%
d) Constructing your arguments and persuading your reader to your point of view — 50%

The essay-type exam will help measure depth of learning and true intelligence. The passing
standard for correction will be work expected of a beginning practitioner, not a seasoned lawyer.

ROBERTO A. ABAD
Associate Justice
2011 Bar Exams Chairman

1 Dr. Leticia Asuzano, How to Construct Multiple Choice Items, Compendium for PRC Board Examiners
citing Thorndike, R.M. Measurement and Evaluation in Psychology and Education, Prentice-Hall, 1977,
New York, New York.
2 Ibid.
3 Ibid.
4 Ibid.
5 Ibid.
6 Ibid.
7 Ibid.
8 Ibid.
9 Ibid.
10 Ibid.
11 Ibid.
12 Ibid.